Tax: Addressing the hybrids

©David Rooney

The global campaign will continue in 2014 to improve international tax rules, many of which were first designed over a century ago, and to make them fit for the era of globalisation and new technologies. In 2013 policy attention was focused on the problem of profit shifting by global firms and its negative effects on tax bases, with the OECD issuing its widely publicised 15-point Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) to leaders at the G20 summit in September. A key action area in the plan concerns crossborder tax hybrid schemes, with an OECD report due to address the problem in 2014. How do they work? 

Taxpayers can sometimes claim a tax deduction for a payment that is either untaxed in the country of receipt of that payment, or for which a deduction has already been claimed in another jurisdiction. These so-called hybrid mismatch arrangements are in effect structured transactions, whose purpose is to lower the tax burden on cross-border investments by exploiting differences in the tax treatment of instruments or entities in different tax jurisdictions.

An OECD report called Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements published in 2012 concluded that although it can be difficult to identify which country has actually lost tax revenue under a hybrid mismatch arrangement, these arrangements pose a collective risk to the tax base of all countries by lowering the aggregate tax burden on taxpayers who use them. As well as raising BEPS concerns, the report concluded that the ability of cross-border investors to use sophisticated and often opaque hybrid structuring techniques to reduce their domestic tax liability can have a negative impact on both the efficiency and fairness of tax systems.

The 2012 report specifically recommended that countries consider introducing “matching” rules that align the tax treatment of instruments and entities in both jurisdictions in order to neutralise their hybrid effect. As part of the BEPS Action Plan, the OECD and G20 countries have taken this recommendation one step further by agreeing to formulate a set of recommendations, domestic rules and treaty provisions designed to eliminate hybrid mismatches. More progress is expected on this front in 2014. The OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs (CFA) has formed a new working party to deal with aggressive tax planning and to help complete a report on eliminating hybrid mismatches in September 2014. The report will cover three main aspects: first, hybrid financing instruments, including sophisticated hybrid transfers; second, expenditures incurred by a hybrid entity that give rise to tax deductions under the laws of two or more jurisdictions (so-called double deduction structures); and third, hybrid structures that are designed to allow an investor to avoid tax on deductible payments made by a counterparty to the arrangement (so-called deduction/ no-inclusion structures).

The OECD-G20 work on hybrids is being undertaken in parallel with work being done by the European Union in relation to intra-EU hybrid mismatch arrangements. However, it has a broader scope and involves a wider range of countries than the EU work.

For John Peterson, who heads the aggressive tax planning unit at the OECD, the work on hybrids is an “interesting and challenging project with a very tight deadline.” Countries have set themselves the task of producing matching rules that are comprehensive, easy for tax authorities to administer, and clear and transparent in their operation, and which keep taxpayer compliance costs to a minimum. Their task is complicated by the need to ensure that the rules target the mismatch and do not disturb other commercial outcomes or result in unintended double taxation for taxpayers.

The first draft of the hybrid mismatch report is due to be released for public consultation at the end of the first quarter of 2014. “This is an ambitious target,” Mr Peterson admits, “but one that captures the importance that G20 and OECD member countries place on the need to urgently address gaps in the international tax architecture that are presently being exploited by these sorts of arrangements.”

OECD (2012), Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements: Tax Policy and Compliance Issues, OECD Publishing.

See  www.oecd.org/tax/

© OECD Observer No 297, Q4 2013




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Editor's choice

  • OECD General-Secretary Angel Gurría on Global Economy. Angel Gurría speaks in Brisbane, where the G-20 summit took place this weekend,on Bloomberg Television's "On the Move."
  • Speaking to Dukascopy TV, OECD’s Peter Jarrett says the deficit reduction plans are not to blame for the stagnation of French growth and increase of unemployment.
  • Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
  • Base Erosion and Profit Shifting: "Currently tax planning results in locating the profits in tax havens where nothing is happening. BEPS is rewriting the international tax rules to realign the location of the profits and the real activity."
  • Try our latest OECD Observer crossword!
  • Better Life Index
    How do you measure a Better Life? The OECD has launched a new interactive infographic where visitors can explore the priorities of people worldwide. Be a part of it. Create and share your Better Life Index.
  • Tim Harcourt Video
  • G20 and Australia: Economist Tim Harcourt speaks to the BBC about how Australia has gone from "Down Under to Down Wonder".
  • OECD Week 2014 : Resilient economies for inclusive societies. Forum 2014 was organised around three cross-cutting themes: Inclusive Growth, Jobs, and Trust. Watch the video. And check out our 2014 yearbook by clicking here.
  • better-life
  • What does a better life mean for you? Watch this video produced by students from La Sorbonne and see what people around the world have to say.
  • In the transition to cleaner and greener economies, the OECD is helping government and business with the tools to get climate finance right for greener growth plus job creation, while treating our environment as a precious resource.

Most Popular Articles

Subscribe Now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Poll

Is deflation a major risk in OECD economies?

Yes
No
Don't know

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2014