PISA: The consequences for Germany

Page 33 

The findings of the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment are alarming. A country with the economic and political significance of Germany belongs at the top of the league and cannot be satisfied with an education system performing at the OECD average level – never mind below it.

But PISA should not mislead us into starting discussions about reforming our education system from scratch again. In fact, many of the shortcomings PISA brought to light were not new. Earlier studies had already drawn attention to the weaknesses of our educational system and prompted me to set a new educational reform process in motion.

Two years ago, I sat with German state officials and social partners, church representatives, parents, pupils and educationalists in an education forum to discuss what would have to change – without regard to our particular areas of responsibility – if our children and young people were to have a better education and better training. The 12 recommendations that emerged from that forum already make a start to addressing the problems that were highlighted by PISA assessment. The time has now come to take action!

Experiences in countries like Finland, Canada, Australia or Japan, who are now reaping the benefits of earlier reforms, suggest that Germany’s educational system can be improved within the foreseeable future. But it is not enough just to copy them; it is a question of learning from good examples and incorporating the lessons into our own strategies.

One thing is clear: the foundations for successful learning are laid early on in life. We must therefore concentrate our efforts on early childhood education. In this respect, the education forum’s demand for clear objectives for early childhood education and care programmes hits the nail right on the head. These must be more than just child-minding facilities. Their job is to stimulate our children’s curiosity and eagerness to learn and to prepare them for primary school. Children with limited aptitude for speech or who do not speak German very well require particular attention so they can start school with the same chances as other children. In addition, we must assess and improve the initial training and in-service training of our teachers.

The shortcomings in reading and mathematical literacy uncovered by PISA make it abundantly clear that there must be a distinct improvement in the individual support offered to all children. There is no contradiction between the improvement of education across the board and the promotion of excellence. Equality of opportunity and fostering excellence in education must both be central planks in our school education system.

We must organise learning in our schools in such ways that children can learn from each other. This benefits the most advanced pupils as well as those who find learning more difficult.

We must also recognise that learning takes time. This is particularly so where children are required not just to absorb information mechanically, but to actively acquire knowledge and skills and apply them. This is why the establishment of full-day schooling throughout Germany is so important. With all-day schooling it would be easier to prevent social exclusion, improve language competence and foster individual talents. All-day schooling – long taken for granted in other countries – is also an important factor in making family life and professional life compatible.

Teachers play an important part in the implementation of these measures. New demands for teachers call for qualifications beyond subject matter specialisation: methodology and didactics, a stronger practical orientation and routine in-service training are an absolute must.

Moreover, our teachers should be given more recognition by society for the hard work they do. As in industry, good teacher performance should be rewarded and we should make greater use of the incentives already available to us.

Last but not least, we must give our schools in Germany greater autonomy, free them from bureaucratic encumbrance and make them fit for the future by giving them more responsibility! Here too PISA shows the way. Finland scored best in the survey. It has empowered schools, while at the same time subjecting them to regular quality control. The right mix of autonomy and assessment is the recipe for an educational system that works.

Good education requires resources. Clearly, we must invest more in the education of our children. The money spent is an investment in the future and must be considered as such, not a cost. The federal government has already set a good example in this respect. Since 1998, expenditure on education and research has been raised by an impressive 21.5% to around € 8.8 billion, the highest level ever.

The 12 recommendations of the education forum are on the table and can now be implemented. I welcome the fact that Germany’s federal and state authorities have jointly decided to monitor the implementation scientifically. A first report on progress is expected for 2004.

References 

• Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), OECD, 2001.

• Hirsch, D., "How good is our global education? The PISA survey", in OECD Observer No 230, January 2002.  

* For more on the 12 recommendations, consult “Empfehlungen und Einzelergebnisse des Forum Bildung”, published by Arbeitsstab Forum Bildung in der Geschäftsstelle der Bund-Länder-Kommission für Bildungsplanung und Forschungsförderung, 2002.

©OECD Observer, No 231/232, May 2002 




Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Suscribe now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Don't miss

  • OECD Observer i-Sheet Series: OECD Observer i-Sheets are smart contents pages on major issues and events. Use them to find current or recent articles, video, books and working papers. To browse on paper and read on line, or simply download.
  • Queen Maxima of the Netherlands gives a speech next to Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto (not pictured) during the International Forum of Financial Inclusion at the National Palace in Mexico City, Mexico June 21, 2016.
  • How sustainable is the ocean as a source of economic development? The Ocean Economy in 2030 examines the risks and uncertainties surrounding the future development of ocean industries, the innovations required in science and technology to support their progress, their potential contribution to green growth and some of the implications for ocean management.
  • OECD Environment Director Simon Upton presented a talk at Imperial College London on 21 April 2016. With the world awash in surplus oil and prices languishing around US$40 per barrel, how can governments step up efforts to transform the world’s energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement?
  • Happy 10th birthday to Twitter. This 2008 OECD Observer interview with Henry Copeland said you’d do well.
  • The OECD Gender Initiative examines existing barriers to gender equality in education, employment, and entrepreneurship. The gender portal monitors the progress made by governments to promote gender equality in both OECD and non-OECD countries and provides good practices based on analytical tools and reliable data.
  • Once migrants reach Europe, countries face integration challenge: OECD's Thomas Liebig speaks to NPR's Audie Cornish.

  • Message from the International Space Station to COP21

  • COP21 Will Get Agreement With Teeth: OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on Bloomberg

  • The carbon clock is ticking: OECD’s Gurría on CNBC

  • If we want to reach zero net emissions by the end of the century, we must align our policies for a low-carbon economy, put a price on carbon everywhere, spend less subsidising fossil fuels and invest more in clean energy. OECD at #COP21 – OECD statement for #COP21
  • They are green and local --It’s a new generation of entrepreneurs in Kenya with big dreams of sustainable energy and the drive to see their innovative technologies throughout Africa. blogs.worldbank.org
  • Pole to Paris Project
  • In order to face global warming, Asia needs at least $40 billion per year, derived from both the public and private sector. Read how to bridge the climate financing gap on the Asian Bank of Development's website.
  • How can cities fight climate change?
    Discover projects in Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan and Mexico.
  • Climate: What's changed, what hasn't, what we can do about it.
    Lecture by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, hosted by the London School of Economics and Aviva Investors in association with ClimateWise, London, UK, 3 July 2015.

  • Climate change: “We should not disagree when scientists tell us we have a window of opportunity–10-15 years–to turn this thing around” argues Senator Bernie Sanders.

  • In the long-run, the EU benefits from migration, says OECD Head of International Migration Division Jean-Christophe Dumont.
  • Is technological progress slowing down? Is it speeding up? At the OECD, we believe the research from our Future of ‪Productivity‬ project helps to resolve this paradox.
  • Is inequality bad for growth? That redistribution boosts economies is not established by the evidence says FT economics editor Chris Giles. Read more on www.ft.com.
  • Catherine Mann, OECD Chief Economist, explains on Bloomberg why "too much bank lending can slow economic growth".
  • Interested in a career in Paris at the OECD? The OECD is a major international organisation, with a mission to build better policies for better lives. With our hub based in one of the world's global cities and offices across continents, find out more at www.oecd.org/careers .

Most Popular Articles

Poll

What issue are you most concerned about in 2016?

Unemployment
Euro crisis
International conflict
Global warming
Other

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2016