Cleaner flow of goods

Strengthening Inland Waterway Transport: Pan-European Co-operation for Progress

Most surface freight transport takes place by rail and road, but with environmental and cost pressures rising, attention is again turning to inland water transport. In the US for instance, inland waterways carried some 500 billion tonne-kilometres of freight in 2003; roads carried three times more, and rail four times.

Europe has more than 30,000 kilometres of waterways that connect hundreds of cities and industrial regions across a mix of 19th century canal networks and navigable rivers such as the Rhine or the Elbe. However, the dominance of road transport is even greater. Take Germany, for instance: 58 billion tonne-kilometres in 2003 by inland waterway, compared with 291 billion for roads and 79 billion for rail.

In Britain, the number for inland waterways was just 0.2. Inland waterway transport accounts for just 6.5% of total inland transport in the EU, and 3.9% for the whole of Europe. Numbers like this prompted the European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) to meet recently to discuss a renewed effort to exploit the rivers and canals across Europe. Reasons to promote a shift are not hard to find.

First is efficiency. For every litre of fuel burned, a barge can carry a tonne of cargo for 127 km, compared to 97 km for a train and a truck for 50 km. Lower energy consumption, high reliability, fewer accidents, savings on storage facilities and the ability to deliver cargo to otherwise inaccessible areas make environmentally-friendly barges an attractive shipping choice.

The cargo capacity of a barge is 15 times that of a rail car and 60 times greater than that of a semi-trailer truck. No wonder Airbus chose canals to ship the large parts of its new 555-seat aircraft to Toulouse, France, using inland waterways from Pauillac to Langon. As the ECMT reports in Strengthening Inland Waterway Transport: Pan-European Co-operation for Progress, the creation of a pan-European inland waterway market is far from reality.

In addition to its slower speed and the need to create more infrastructure by dredging rivers and building locks, it also means having to harmonise regulations and procedures across borders and regions. And it demands creating a level playing field for business, with a freer market based on fair competition, rather than the highly regulated quasi-monopolistic situation several countries face at present.

Boosting waterway transport is not all good news and opening canals can be politically controversial. Proposals to build a canal link for freight from the Rhine across France to the Rhone via the Saone river were shelved after a public outcry–including from towns on route–as the prospect of large barges ploughing through unspoilt country calm became an election issue. The outcry was not without foundation: water traffic causes water contamination, air pollution and noise.

It competes with leisure uses, from boating and water skiing to fishing, which all have a bearing on property values, land uses, tourism, and so on. And shipping freight hurts ecosystems. As another ECMT book, Inland Waterways and Environmental Protection points out, dams, weirs, locks and dredging may induce changes in water levels, discharge regimes and river bed geomorphology, and could affect sedimentation and erosion.

Despite all this, inland waterway transport remains more environmentally friendly than other land transport modes in terms of total cost, particularly road. The second report says that if the 440 million tonnes of cargo shipped by inland waterways were carried by road, emissions to air in Europe would be at least 10% higher. Shifting the balance back towards inland waterways would be a challenge, and further adapting the network to meet the environmental concerns of today would help.

Strengthening Inland Waterway Transport: ISBN 928211354X

Inland Waterways and Environmental Protection: ISBN 9282113469

©OECD Observer No 257, October 2006



Bookmark this


Economic data

E-Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news from the OECD by signing up for our e-newsletter :

Twitter feed

Editor's choice

  • OECD General-Secretary Angel Gurría on Global Economy. Angel Gurría speaks in Brisbane, where the G-20 summit took place this weekend,on Bloomberg Television's "On the Move."
  • Speaking to Dukascopy TV, OECD’s Peter Jarrett says the deficit reduction plans are not to blame for the stagnation of French growth and increase of unemployment.
  • Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
  • Base Erosion and Profit Shifting: "Currently tax planning results in locating the profits in tax havens where nothing is happening. BEPS is rewriting the international tax rules to realign the location of the profits and the real activity."
  • Try our latest OECD Observer crossword!
  • Better Life Index
    How do you measure a Better Life? The OECD has launched a new interactive infographic where visitors can explore the priorities of people worldwide. Be a part of it. Create and share your Better Life Index.
  • Tim Harcourt Video
  • G20 and Australia: Economist Tim Harcourt speaks to the BBC about how Australia has gone from "Down Under to Down Wonder".
  • OECD Week 2014 : Resilient economies for inclusive societies. Forum 2014 was organised around three cross-cutting themes: Inclusive Growth, Jobs, and Trust. Watch the video. And check out our 2014 yearbook by clicking here.
  • better-life
  • What does a better life mean for you? Watch this video produced by students from La Sorbonne and see what people around the world have to say.
  • In the transition to cleaner and greener economies, the OECD is helping government and business with the tools to get climate finance right for greener growth plus job creation, while treating our environment as a precious resource.

Most Popular Articles

Subscribe Now

<b>Subscribe now!</b>

To receive your exclusive print editions delivered to you directly


Online edition
Previous editions

Poll

Is deflation a major risk in OECD economies?

Yes
No
Don't know

OECD Insights Blog

NOTE: All signed articles in the OECD Observer express the opinions of the authors
and do not necessarily represent the official views of OECD member countries.

All rights reserved. OECD 2014